Professional Case Simulations for Legal Nurse Consultants

THE
CHART FILES

The medical record is evidence. Your job is to determine what it actually establishes.

Work a realistic case the way an LNC actually receives it: an engagement letter, a Bates-labeled production, supplemental disclosures, and EHR audit data. Commit to your findings at each checkpoint. Then break the seal and compare your reasoning to the analysis.

Not a game. Not easy. These are full medical-record case simulations built to challenge working professionals. The evidence is incomplete, the obvious answer is usually wrong, and the analysis will grade your reasoning, not your intuition.

NewCase 006: Numerator Met. A two-level merit review and case investigation. $39.95.

See the Case Files

Instant PDF download  •  Six cases, from 60 minutes to two sittings  •  Printable workbook included

Built by an RN & LNC with 11+ years inside EHR systems Real-format records, audit trails & Bates numbering Sealed, scored Investigator's Analysis

Investigations

The Case Files

Each file presents a medical-legal problem through the records, system data, and evidence an investigator actually encounters. The answer isn't supplied. You work the evidence — in stages — and commit before you see what comes next.

What makes The Chart Files different? Read about the investigative approach behind the series.

Chart File
001

The 14:06 Administration

The MAR says hydromorphone was given at 14:06. The order says 14:19. Was the medication given before it was ordered — and did it cause the respiratory event?

A postoperative patient deteriorates on the floor. The record tells a clean story. The audit trail, and then the bedside monitor data, tell you what that story is built on.

TimestampsMAR & ordersEHR audit trailTimeline reconstruction
$24.95
  • 37-page case file
  • 17 record documents
  • Intermediate–Advanced
  • 60–90 minutes
Open Case 001
Chart File
002

The Diagnosis That Grew

An expert calls her bipolar II diagnosis "well-documented … by multiple providers independently." How did the chart come to know that — and how sure was it at the time?

Fourteen months of primary care, urgent care, psychiatry, ED, and inpatient records. Then outside records, pharmacy data, and EHR audits showing where "independent" documentation actually came from.

Diagnostic provenanceProblem listsCopy-forwardCompeting explanations
$24.95
  • 81-page case file
  • 35 record documents + expert opinion
  • 22-point scored analysis
  • Moderate · 60–90 minutes
Open Case 002
Chart File
003

The Clean Copy

The family's portal download of the ED note doesn't match the hospital's certified copy. Both show the same signature time. Which one did the doctor sign — and when was the other one written?

A patient leaves the ED and dies hours later. Then come the version history, the access log, and the print template, which show what happened to her record after she died. The hospital's accounting of disclosures lists one entry. The access log shows seven users.

Version historyAccess logsPrint templatesCorroboration
$24.95
  • 49-page case file
  • 19 record documents + 2 exhibits
  • 21-point scored analysis
  • Advanced · 90–120 minutes
Open Case 003
Chart File
004

The Strip

Our expert says the emergency C-section was never needed, and the nursing chart backs her up. Does the fetal monitor?

A healthy baby, a lacerated bladder, and a labor flowsheet that looks reassuring. Then the monitoring archive, the pump log, and the phone records arrive, and the clocks don't agree. The hardest part: testing the foundation of your own side's expert.

Fetal monitoring stripsDevice clocksLate entriesYour own expert
$34.95
  • 55-page case file
  • 20 documents + monitoring strips
  • 22-point scored analysis
  • Expert · 2–3 hours
Open Case 004
Chart File
005
New

The Clean Timeline

Counsel's AI chronology says the sepsis bundle started six minutes after the order. It's polished and fully cited. Can anyone rely on it?

A defense-retained capstone. Build your chronology from a 46-page chart, with AI if you choose. Then audit it against alert, device, dispensing, pump, and access data, and audit a prior reviewer's AI work product before counsel files it.

AI-assisted reviewEvent vs. entry timeDevice & alert dataSepsis timeline
$39.95
  • Staged 5-file package (94 pages)
  • 42 documents
  • 25-point scored analysis
  • Capstone · 3–4 hours
Open Case 005
Chart File
006
New

Numerator Met

She walked in with pneumonia and left without her leg. Every quality measure on the chart says the care was compliant. Is there a case?

A two-level investigation built on duty, standard, breach, causation, and damages. Write the merit memo from a 192-page certified record. Then the audit trail, messages, document versions, policies, and depositions arrive, and responsibility moves. Not everything that looks wrong is a breach.

Merit reviewStandard of care vs. quality measuresAudit trails & UTCTransitions of care
$39.95
  • Staged 4-file package (230 pages)
  • 192-page record + 15 discovery exhibits
  • 100-point scored analysis
  • Two-Level · 8–12 hours
Open Case 006
Mini-Cases

Short on time? Work a mini-case.

New

Twenty to thirty minutes, four record excerpts, one question from counsel, and a sealed answer with the follow-up record that changes the picture. A real test, not a worksheet, and the fastest way into the full case files.

CF-MC-002

Within Defined Limits

"Our admission skin assessment says within defined limits. Was this pressure injury present on admission?"

Defense counsel wants the flowsheet to answer the question. Read what "WDL" actually asserts, then set it beside the records made on either side of it.

Charting by exceptionPresent on admission
CF-MC-003

The Stated Weight

"Somebody typed her weight in pounds. That's how she got a double dose. Was the enoxaparin dose wrong?"

Plaintiff's counsel has a theory. Do the arithmetic before you accept it, then trace the number every dose was built on back to its first source.

Weight-based dosingData provenance
CF-MC-004

MD Aware

"The nurse wrote 'MD aware.' The attending testified nobody called him. Who's telling the truth?"

A critical potassium, a two-word nursing note, and a deposition. Which MD, aware of what, and when?

Critical-value communicationAttribution

Want to try the format first? The Quiet Night is free.

Training a team or running an LNC program?
Group and classroom licenses are available for firms, LNC certificate programs, and nursing education.
Ask About Licensing

Look Inside

These aren't worksheets.
They're records.

Every document is formatted as a printed EHR report: patient banners, status fields, signature times, Bates numbers. You read headers and metadata the way you would in practice, because they're evidence too. A few excerpts:

NORTH RIVER MEDICAL CENTERMedication Administration Record
HYDROmorphone 0.5 mg, IV push, every 3 hours PRN severe breakthrough pain.
05/14/2025 14:06Given0.5 mg IV pushGrant, Melissa RN
Details: Pre-dose pain 8/10
CONFIDENTIAL PATIENT INFORMATIONNRMC 000007

Case 001The entry that starts the investigation. What does 14:06 actually prove?

HARBOR POINT HEALTHProblem List & History
ProblemICD-10NotedStatus
Bipolar II disorderF31.8105/23/2024Active
ADHD, pred. inattentiveF90.002/12/2024Active
CONFIDENTIAL PATIENT INFORMATIONHPH 000003

Case 002A "noted" date. Who typed it, when, and what does it establish?

HPH-PROD · CLINICAL AUDIT SERVICESSupplemental Disclosure
AUDIT REPORT: NOTE TEXT SOURCE ATTRIBUTION
SECTION · TEXT AS DISPLAYED · SOURCE TYPE · SOURCE DETAIL
SOURCE TYPES: TYPED · TEMPLATE · DATA LINK · MACRO · COPIED
Released mid-case, after Checkpoint TwoHPH-AUD 000003

Case 002EHR metadata that shows where "independent" documentation came from.

THE CHART FILESInvestigator Workbook
STOP
The chart says "bipolar II disorder" many times.
How many times did anyone decide it?
Checkpoint OneWB-03

WorkbookCommit to written answers before the next disclosure opens.

MYRIDGE HEALTH · PATIENT PORTALVisit Notes — ED
Diagnosis: Chest pain, unspecified.
Electronically signed by Anand Mehta, MD on 01/15/2025 7:10 AM
Downloaded 01/16/2025 10:22 AM by Megan Keane (proxy)
Family's portal downloadEXHIBIT A

Case 003The family's copy. Same signature time as the certified copy. Different words.

CRH-PROD · CLINICAL AUDIT SERVICESUser Access Log
01/16 08:10:40PRYOR, DANA RNRM-OFF-01VIEW
01/16 08:31:07PRYOR, DANA RNRM-OFF-01PRINT
01/16 11:32:44ROMERO, TINAHIM-ROI-04PRINT / RELEASE
Released mid-case, after Checkpoint OneCRH-AUD 000002

Case 003The accounting of disclosures lists one entry. The access log tells a longer story.

TIDEWATER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERLabor Flowsheet
15:00FHR / UA…decels none; Category IKLINDQVIST
15:00OxytocinDiscontinued — tachysystoleKLINDQVIST
Time column displays documented performed time.
CONFIDENTIAL PATIENT INFORMATIONTRMC 000004

Case 004Our own expert relied on these entries. When were they actually typed?

TRMC CLINICAL ENGINEERINGInfusion Pump Event Log
At the moment of download, network time was 09:40:18 and the pump clock displayed 09:46:28.
Drift between 03/08/2025 and 03/11/2025 was not measured.
Released mid-case, after Checkpoint OneTRMC-CE 000001

Case 004Every clock is a witness. This one runs six minutes fast.

MARSH HARBOR GENERAL HOSPITALMedication Administration Record
10/14 18:24NS 30 mL/kg (2,400 mL) IV bolusStartedTWYNN
10/14 18:27Piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5 g IVGiven — 4.5 gTWYNN
Date/Time displays documented administration time.
CONFIDENTIAL PATIENT INFORMATIONMHGH 000019

Case 005Your AI will turn this into a timeline in seconds. Is it when it happened?

LEXCHRON LITIGATION SUPPORTAI-Assisted Chronology
KEY INTERVALS (COMPUTED)
Order → first antibiotic6 minutes18:21 → 18:27
Recognition → 30 mL/kg crystalloid initiated12 minutes18:12 → 18:24
Stage III — prior reviewer's AI work productMHGH-VEN 000003

Case 005Polished, fully cited, and AI-generated. Audit it before counsel relies on it.

  • Engagement letter from counsel
  • Certified, Bates-labeled production
  • Staged supplemental disclosures
  • EHR audit & system data
  • STOP pages & written checkpoints
  • 60-second Final Challenge
  • Sealed Investigator's Analysis
  • Model response & scoring rubric
  • Records-to-request list

Who It's For

A case to work before someone
pays you to work theirs.

New & aspiring LNCs

You've learned the concepts. This is where you practice them against a realistic production — with staged evidence, a deadline-style challenge, and an analysis to check yourself against.

Experienced LNCs

Test your process when nothing is riding on it. Can you resist premature closure? Tell repetition from corroboration? Separate the documented time from the actual event?

Forensic nurses & reviewers

Nurse reviewers, forensic nurses, UR/QA staff, and litigation-support professionals who want sharper, more defensible record analysis.

This isn't a puzzle box or a "spot the error" worksheet. No ciphers, no riddles, no single hidden answer. Each file is a full case simulation: staged evidence, competing explanations, and a record that can mislead you in more than one direction. Most reviewers get something wrong on the first pass. That's the point: better here than in a real case.

Case Files Written By

Shane Huey
MS, MBA, RN, LNC

I've spent 14 years as a registered nurse and more than 11 years building and optimizing the EHR systems that produce these records — the order sets, flowsheets, problem lists, and audit logs most reviewers only ever see as printouts.

That's why the Chart Files look the way they do. The traps in each case aren't invented for effect. They're how real documentation actually behaves: back-timed entries, planned orders, auto-populated histories, copied text, and timestamps that describe the record rather than the event.

14 yrs RN11+ yrs EHR systemsLegal Nurse ConsultantMS, Information Security & Digital Forensics

Questions

Before you open a file.

Which case should I start with?

Every case works on its own, but they build on each other. Case 001 (Intermediate) focuses on time: what a timestamp actually proves. Case 002 (Intermediate) focuses on provenance: how a diagnosis travels through a chart. Case 003 (Advanced) is about revised notes and audit trails. Case 004 (Expert) adds fetal monitoring strips, device clocks, and testing your own expert's foundation. Case 005 (Capstone) combines all of it with AI-assisted review. If you're newer to record review, start with 001. For Case 005, we recommend completing 003 and 004 first. If you purchased the EHR Audit Trails program, Case 003 is already included as its capstone.

Not sure the format is for you yet? Start with a $9.95 mini-case: Within Defined Limits, The Stated Weight, or MD Aware. Each takes 20 to 30 minutes. Or try The Quiet Night, which is free.

Do I need to be an LNC?

No. The cases are written for Legal Nurse Consultants, but nurse reviewers, forensic nurses, UR/QA staff, and litigation-support professionals use the same skills. A clinical background helps. No legal background is required.

What format is it? Can I print it?

Cases 001 through 004 are each a single PDF, and each mini-case is a single short PDF. Case 005 is a staged package of five PDFs with a README: a workbook, the clinical record, the digital record, a prior reviewer's AI chronology, and the sealed analysis. You open each file only when the workbook tells you to. Everything is an instant download and designed to print. Most people work the checkpoints on paper and keep the sealed analysis closed until the end.

Is there an answer key?

Yes. In Cases 001 through 004 and in every mini-case, it's sealed at the back of the file. In Case 005 it's a separate sealed file, so the answer isn't sitting in the same PDF as the evidence. Every full-case key includes the investigator's findings, a model response to the Final Challenge, a records-to-request list, and a scoring rubric. It explains what the evidence permits you to say and why, not just "the answer."

Can I use AI?

Case 005 is built for it: AI use is permitted and encouraged, but optional, and you can complete the case without it. The case teaches you to verify what the tool produces, not just accept it. For the other cases, AI is your choice, but the reasoning is the point. In any case, never upload a sealed analysis or a later-stage file to an AI tool. And never upload real patient records to any AI tool without the retaining attorney's approval of the specific tool and its data handling.

Are these real cases?

No. All patients, clinicians, facilities, and events are fictional. The documentation behaviors, EHR mechanics, and evidentiary problems are drawn from how real records work.

Do the cases offer continuing-education credit?

Not yet, but I am working on this!

What's your refund policy?

Because each case file is a complete, instantly downloadable investigation, and the sealed analysis can't be un-read once it's opened, all sales are final. That said, if anything goes wrong (a download that won't open, a missing page, a file that isn't what was described), let me know and I'll make it right, quickly.

Can I use these to train a team or a class?

Yes, with a group license. Individual purchases are licensed for one person. For firms, LNC programs, and educators, get in touch about classroom and team pricing.

Will there be more cases?

Yes, new cases will be released monthly. Join the list below to hear first.

The file is waiting

The record is not the event.
Find out what it proves.

Staged evidence, real-format records, and a sealed analysis to measure your reasoning against.

Short on time? Try a 20-minute mini-case for $9.95: Within Defined Limits · The Stated Weight · MD Aware · or The Quiet Night, free.